Frequency Research Foundation continues to find SV40 vaccine in malignant cells. Strains of the virus have proliferated and promote cancer wherever found. Many new strains discovered in 1917 will be published here. This is the most studied virus in human history. See Bookchin and Schumacher’s exellent book “The Virus and the Vaccine.”

Vaccine scandal revives cancer fear

19:00 07 July 04 New Scientist

Many millions more people than previously thought might have been given polio vaccine contaminated with a monkey virus linked to cancer.

It has been known since 1960 that early doses of polio vaccine were widely contaminated with simian virus 40, or SV40, which infects macaque monkeys. Tens of millions of people in the US and an unknown number in other countries, including the UK, Australia and the former Soviet Union, may have been exposed prior to 1963.

The contamination occurred because the kidney cells the vaccine virus was grown in came from monkeys infected with SV40. Health officials say the problem was eliminated after 1963.

Now Michele Carbone of Loyola University Medical Center in Chicago has announced results that suggest the Soviet polio vaccine was contaminated after 1963, possibly until the early 1980s. “Is there infectious virus? The short answer is, yes,” Carbone told the Vaccine Cell Substrate Conference 2004 in Rockville, Maryland, last week.

The vaccine was almost certainly used throughout the Soviet bloc and probably exported to China, Japan and several countries in Africa. That means hundreds of millions could have been exposed to SV40 after 1963.

[trx_button type=”square” style=”filled” size=”small” align=”left” link=”https://www.frequencyfoundation.com/product/sv40/” popup=”no” top=”inherit” bottom=”inherit” left=”inherit” right=”inherit”]SV40 Frequencies[/trx_button]

The SV40 Cancer Foundation provides an awesome summary of the history of SV40 and the polio vaccine. Here is a short excerpt:

SV40—A Human Carcinogen

By 1999, numerous pathologists, microbiologists, and virologists throughout the world had detected SV40 in a variety of human cancers such as brain tumors[66] including medulloblastomas,[67] bone cancers,[68] and mesotheliomas[69] a fatal lung cancer. These were the very same cancers that were created when SV40 was introduced into animals.[70] The advent of Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) technology that could identify the genetic code of specific strands of DNA demonstrated with precision that it was this monkey virus that was being detected in human cancers and no other.[71] Moreover, the rates of these particular cancers had steadily increased over the last few decades.[72] The question that had been left unanswered for almost four decades now faced scientists again—was SV40 responsible for causing or contributing to human cancers?

Over the last forty years since its discovery, SV40 had become one of the most widely studied and best understood viruses in microbiology.[73] It was routinely used to create human cancers in the laboratory in order to test cancer therapies.[74] In addition, it is now known how this virus caused cancer on a molecular level. After careful study documented in peer reviewed publications, leaders in SV40 research announced that SV40 was a class 2A human carcinogen.[75]

The Government’s Response

Nonetheless, the various United States government agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and National Cancer Institute (NCI) disputed these conclusions. According to the CDC, “SV40 virus has been found in certain types of cancer in humans, but it has not been determined that SV40 causes these cancers.”[76] According to the National Intsitutes of Health (NIH), “the NCI is continuing to evaluate the possible link between SV40 infection and human cancers.”[77] A question has been raised whether this continuing evaluation is being performed with complete scientific integrity. One article written by an attorney and published in a peer reviewed scientific journal describes how the NCI deliberately compromised a study that would have demonstrated the association between SV40 and mesothelioma.[78]

While the United States government continues to evaluate whether or not SV40 represents a public health threat and whether SV40 is a human carcinogen, several scientists at the NCI concluded that SV40 contributed to the formation of mesotheliomas.[79] In fact, the federal government has licensed technology to target SV40 in the treatment of human mesotheliomas.[80]

SV40 and the Public Health

Despite the government’s foot dragging, in the last several years, scientists from around the world have made startling and disturbing discoveries. They have found SV40 antibodies in a significant percentage of people including children who were too young to receive the SV40 contaminated vaccines of the early 1960’s.[81] They have also discovered that cancers with SV40 are less likely to be responsive to chemotherapy and radiation because SV40 interferes with the genes necessary for cancer cells to die when they are exposed to chemo or radiation therapy.[82]

The Institute of Medicine Report

In July 2002, the National Academy of Science Institute of Medicine (IOM) Immunization Safety Committee convened a study into SV40 and cancer which culminated in a report published in October 2002. According to the IOM report “SV40 Contamination of Polio Vaccine and Cancer”:

The committee concludes that the biological evidence is strong that SV40 is a transforming [i.e., cancer-causing] virus, . . . that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure could lead to cancer in humans under natural conditions, [and] that the biological evidence is of moderate strength that SV40 exposure from the polio vaccine is related to SV40 infection in humans.[83]

The Australians who get a lot of basal cell carcinomas have developed a cream based on egg-plant extract that targets receptor sites on cancer cells and kills them. It has been tested in clinical trials and eliminates virtually 100% of basal cell tumors and some other cancers. This is a great alternative to surgery. See Cancer Letters clinical trial.

BEC 5 Curaderm is widely available without a prescription. It does demand some patience as it takes some weeks for the body to heal after repeated application.

Frequencies alone can eliminate basal cell carcinomas but it is a lot easier in combination with Curaderm. The advantage of frequencies it that they target the underlying cause of the cancer so it is possible to eliminate recurrence and new basal cell carcinomas.

Frequency Research Foundation subscribers have access to extensive sets of frequencies useful with cancer. It is advisable to get a Photoanalysis consultation to use them effectively.

As always consult with your own physician if there are problems. My physician showed me his own basal cell that he cured with Curaderm during my last patient visit.

The Beauty of the Marburg Virus

Cosmos Magazine – 14 April 2017

Photo; The University of Texas at Galveston

“The Marburg virus, a relative of Ebola, causes a haemorrhagic fever that kills around 80% of people who are infected. Though the virus is rare, there is currently no effective treatment. Even in those who survive and undergo an apparently complete recovery, the virus may re-emerge in later life or be passed on to children.”

Almost half a dozen strains of the Marburg Virus have been sequenced. Some were circulating in the flu several years ago.

A client had severe headaches for over a year. Frequencies were used for biofilms, viruses, parasites, and original Rife frequencies for the organism that causes cancer. Some periodic relief but no cure. Only when the Marburg Virus was identified did all symptoms disappear within a day.

20 years ago the Frequency Research Foundation started talking about electronic medicine. Scientific American reviews the latest research and calls it bioelectronic medicine. It works because electronic frequencies can cause the body to manufacture drugs.

[trx_image url=”https://www.frequencyfoundation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Scientific_American_-_March_2015-300×250.jpg” align=”left” shape=”square” top=”inherit” bottom=”inherit” left=”inherit” right=”inherit”]

It takes 20 years for conventional science to catch up with research. You can send an electronic signature that conveys the same information that the physical drug provides without many of the negative side effects. The electronic signature of DNA can be sent over the internet and DNA in a distance lab will self-construct in a test tube with the basic ingredients. CRISPR which does DNA editing creates many errors when done with viruses yet electromagnetic frequencies allow much more precise gene editing. All of these findings are published in leading medical journals. Most physicians are not even aware of them and none of them have reached the clinical trial phase at the time of this writing.

The Spooky 2 site offers an easy way to convert the molecular weight of a drug to frequencies without knowing the details of the formulas required. Spooky was motivated by early Frequency Research Foundation work. Any substance with a known molecular weight can be converted into a frequency for subscribers. Also any Frequency Research Foundation data sets can be converted to Spooky format on this web site.

You might see electronic drugs in Scientific American in about 20 years, maybe sooner.

Richard Horton is the editor of one of the leading medical journals in the world, The Lancet. Here is what he reported from a UK symposium on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research:

“A lot of what is published is incorrect.” I’m not allowed to say who made this remark because we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not to take photographs of slides. Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted, since the forthcoming UK election meant they were living in “purdah”—a chilling state where severe restrictions on freedom of speech are placed on anyone on the government’s payroll. Why the paranoid concern for secrecy and non-attribution? Because this symposium—on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London last week—touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations. * The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue.”

Click here for the full article …