My name is Obafemi Ayanbadejo and my brother and I both play football in the NFL. I’m a fullback for the Arizona Cardinals and this is my 9th year in the NFL. I was on the Super Bowl Champion Baltimore Ravens in 2000. My brother, Brendon, is a linebacker for the Chicago Bears, and is in his third year in the NFL.

My former coach, Greg Smith, gave us the patches before spring training and we have been wearing them ever since. I work out extremely hard and really know and understand my physical abilities and I noticed an increase in my endurance and ran the best splits I have ever run. I also noticed an increase in overall cardio and basically, the patches just allow me to run more and run longer.

Brendon says ” I like wearing the patches, especially on game day, because I love the feeling of the energy surge I get”.

——————————
Things for you to consider before trying LifeWave patches (energy, sleep, weight, …)

1. LiveWave patches work on the electromagnetic field of your body. There is absolutely nothing that goes into your body. As a result they completely avoid any of the possible negative side effects of drugs, herbs, or other supplements.

2. Changes are subtle when using LifeWave patches. You need to test over time. Superbowl champions measure their performance carefully. A 10% difference can win or lose a championship game. Patches will make more than a 10% difference, yet the average person is out of touch with their body energy and body performance and won’t notice it.

3. Sleep patches I use more than any other as they stop my mind from churning over things I have done or ought to do and I sleep like a log. However, I don’t normally have problems sleeping. If you have a serious sleep disorder, patches will not magically solve your problem. You might not even notice an effect.

4. You must have the patches on the right spot. This can be determined precisely if you are sensitive enough to notice an energy shift when moving them over the appropriate spot. You can use muscle testing, dowsing, whatever works for you. If you are unable to test with precision, you will get some benefit but not the maximum benefit.

That said, if you want to optimize performance during a normal working day, listen to champion athletes. They don’t use anything that doesn’t work!

Click here to order Livewave patches. Or call (770) 246-2601 and give them my distributor number 603396.

Contact your Congressperson to co-sponsor the Health Freedom Protection Act, H. R. 2117.

Congressman Ron Paul, MD (R-TX) has done it again. He has introduced a great bill into the House of Representatives, The Health Freedom Protection Act, H.R. 2117. This bill is of monumental importance to your health and health freedom.

Short, pithy and to the point, it allows supplements to carry scientifically justified health claims. It shifts the burden of proof to the FDA to prove that health claims are NOT scientifically warranted, rather than assuming that health claims are forbidden as advertising unless they relates directly to either structure or function.

Thus, “Cherries may be good for arthritis” would be permitted since there is strong scientific evidence that they help people with joint pain.

The FDA has issued warnings to cherry farmers that they will be shut down if they continue to claim cherries are good for you. The Health Freedom Protection Act, H.R. 2117, remedies this incredible and unbelievable situation.

CoQ10 and Cancer
William Faldon, Life Extension 2007 Collectors Edition, 3-5

A startling finding of CoQ10’s anticancer mechanism of action was discovered in recent studies … at the University of Miami… In a July, 2005 telephone interview, principal investigator Dr. S.I. Hsia told Life Extension:

“This is the first time in history we have been able to selectively teach a cancer cell to kill itself with CoQ10, via a mitochondiral mechanism without harming healthy cells.”

Tamoxifen used to treat breast cancer has a substantially enhanced effect along with CoQ10 in both human and animal studies.

NCI has documented several studies showing CoQ10 preventing chemotherapy damage, shrinking or eliminating tumors, decreasing use of painkillers, etc. Since they viewed these studies as inconclusive, they have scheduled two clinical trials.

—
You could die while waiting for the results of these clinical trials and you should be taking CoQ10 regularly anyway for general health. It is critical to heart function and a core component of Dr. Sinatra’s advanced treatment of heart disease. Why not use his ideas for prevention of heart disease and reduce cancer risk as a bonus?

My current preventive strategy for (1) heart disease, (2) cancer, and (3) staying out of the hospital (the three leading causes of death) is:

1. Diet and exercise – follow Kevin Trudeau’s recommendations. They work.
2. Transfer Factor Plus Advanced Formula – pump up your immune system 3-6 times.
3. Dr. Sinatra’s heart supplements which give you CoQ10
4. Dr. Sear’s fish oil for heart and brain
5. Green tea supplements to radically reduce risk of prostate cancer, among other things. Newer supplements are also fat burners so you can lose some weight in the process.
6. Echinacea – it may or may not help the common cold, but it will definitely increase killer T cell production which will reduce cancer risk.

While I do a few more things to keep the biological age of my heart 27 years younger than my physical age (as documented at the Frontier Medical Clinic aging research center), the simple practices above could conservatively eliminate over half the heart disease and cancer in the United States (not to mention diabetes and a few other annoying syndromes).

Save yourself! Your doctor can’t do it for you.

Bone, Kerry. My favorite herb has just been declared a miracle drug. Dr. Jonathan Wright’s Nutrition and Healing 14:2:7, April 2007

… researchers gave healthy young adult mice oral doses of Echinacea purpurea root (0.45 mg per 25 g body weight, similar to human dosage rates) to see if it would stimulate the production of NK cells. After receiving the Echinacea for two weeks, the mice had significantly higher levels (around 25 percent more) of NK cells in their spleens. They also had 25 percent more monocytes, the ‘helper’ cells for NK cells, in both their bone marrow and in their spleens. (The Echinacea treatment influenced no other white blood cell counts.) When they conducted experiments in healthy, elderly mice, the researchers found that after just two weeks of giving the mice oral doses of Echinacea, the NK cell numbers in their bone marrow and their spleens returned to the levels of young adults —and, just as importantly, the Echinacea also resurrected the killing capacity of these cells. Dr. Miller said, “These observations appear to apply uniquely to this herb since we could never rejuvenate the NK cell-mediated component of the immune system in elderly mice by any of the other typical NK cell enhancers.”

Long-term use for lifetime benefits
One of the persistent controversies about Echinacea is whether you can safely take it for long periods of time. According to Miller’s findings, the answer is definitely in the affirmative, at least when it’s administered to mice.When mice were fed Echinacea purpurea root from seven weeks of age to 13 months (0.45 mg per 25 g body weight), not only was the Echinacea NOT detrimental—it was distinctly beneficial. By 13 months of age, only 46 percent of the control mice fed the standard chow were still alive, as compared with 74 percent of those consuming Echinacea. As might be expected from previous experiments, the NK cell levels in the Echinacea-fed mice were considerably elevated compared to controls.

—-
Research citations are all available for subscribers to Dr. Wright’s newsletter (recommended). You might check the National Institutions of Health or the University of Maryland sites on the use of Echinacea.

As a former professor of preventive medicine, I can assure you that every dollar spent on prevention will save more than $10 later on in medical bills. If you are predisposed to cancer or Lyme disease (and who isn’t is this toxic age) and do not have autoimmune disorders, in addition to Transfer Factor Plus you might take a look at Echinacea as these chronic diseases both have large numbers of aberrant cells long before disease symptoms appear.

More mountain patients reporting sickness since yellow dust appeared

by Laurie A. Kelly, The Alpenhorn News, Crestline, CA

The unexplained yellow powder that mysteriously appeared in mountain communities last Dec. 7 and again in February has prompted The Alpenhorn News to further investigation of the appearance of these aerial trails that many believe are the cause of the increase in respiratory problems plaguing mountain communities.

Chemtrails, the visible vapor streams left by low-altitude chemical spraying, have been under scrutiny for more than seven years now, since the first appearances of the heavy white streamers in the sky in early 1999. Despite the efforts of investigators, very little information has been released to the public.

Locally, the issue surfaced in early December when many mountain residents observed a fine, slippery yellow powder on their cars and around the exterior of their homes.

Gretchen Sherman, who lives in Cedar Glen, said she was concerned enough about the situation that she notified the South Coast Air Quality Management District and the agency sent an inspector to her home. The man took a sample, she said, and tentatively identified the powder as cedar pollen.

However, a biologist told this newspaper that December is not the season when cedar pollen normally appears, and that when it does appear, in the spring, it does not “explode.” Several witnesses said they had seen a yellow cloud “exploding” in the skies over the Lake Arrowhead area prior to the appearance of the mysterious yellow dust or powder.

Government officials have repeatedly dodged the questions of concerned citizens and, when pressed, have said the appearance of powder in other areas is nothing more than pollen. People continue to become ill and high levels of chemicals continue to show up in random testing of soil and water supplies, according to informed sources.

In the beginning, the activities of chemtrail investigators were considered nothing more than speculation. Scientists connected to these efforts were considered to be conspiracy theorists. But with the increasingly visible presence of chemtrails, many contend that the time has come for speculation to lead into knowledge, as theory – and fears – are apparently becoming reality.

Witnesses have told this newspaper that they have seen and photographed KC 135s and KC 10s, stripped of any military markings and outfitted with what appears to be a “spraying device.” Airport personnel and pilots have confirmed for this reporter that some commercial airliners have also been outfitted to leave long-lasting chemtrails. One former Air Force pilot, who wished not to be named, said, “Yeah, we have them, but were not supposed to talk about it.”

Conspiring to suppress information and deny freedom of speech to vendors and consumers alike is routine in business. Often the corporation with the most money to hire the most lawyers wins. Only a vigilant citizen democracy can save our basic freedoms (not to mention our health and well being).

The Organic Consumers site reports:

MONSANTO WANTS TO MAKE RBGH LABELING ILLEGAL: This week, Monsanto declared war on dairy companies that have chosen to ban the injection of their cows with Monsanto’s genetically engineered Bovine Growth Hormone (rBGH). Due to escalating consumer demand, an increasing number of large dairies around the U.S. have declared themselves rBGH-free in the last couple of years. Monsanto, the sole producer of the synthetic hormone, has seen substantial losses in sales as a result of this voluntary movement of the industry towards healthier milk. Although rBGH is banned in most industrialized nations, including Europe and Canada, due to its links to breast and colon cancer, the controversial drug remains legal in the U.S. This week, Monsanto filed a formal complaint with the FDA and Federal Trade Commission, demanding that labeling of rBGH-free diary products be made illegal.

On a more positive note, sometimes the good guys win against corruption and collusion in the revolving door between certain industries and government agencies.

MAD COW SAFETY TESTS LIKELY TO INCREASE THANKS TO USDA LOSING LAWSUIT: Creekstone Farms has won one of the most bizarre court cases the USDA has brought upon itself in recent years. Early last year, after the discovery of another case of Mad Cow Disease in the U.S., foreign markets tightened their ban on U.S. beef based on the fact that the USDA requires such a small percentage of meat to be tested for this fatal disease. In an attempt to maintain sales with customers overseas, Kansas-based Creekstone Farms announced it would voluntarily test all of its meat for Mad Cow Disease. Surprisingly, the USDA responded to Creekstone, saying it was illegal for them to have such high quality food safety testing. This action left Creekstone and its lawyers scratching their heads trying to figure out where in the law books it states that it’s illegal to test food for safety beyond what is required by law. Creekstone took the USDA to court and last week a federal judge ruled against the USDA. The results of the case will likely create a domino effect in the industry where more meatpackers will voluntarily choose to increase testing for Mad Cow Disease in order to allure international and domestic customers. Is it out of the question to envision meats in future supermarkets bearing the voluntary label “This meat has been tested for Mad Cow Disease”?

This report would be funny if it wasn’t about the institution that is supposed to be promoting your health, yet does more to support VIOXX than it does to support peer reviewed evidence of substantial health benefit. The irony of this is that it is as bad for business as it is for the American people. This kind of PR could reduce drug company stock prices.

FDA Threatens To Raid Cherry Orchards
William Faloon, LE Magazine, March 2007

As Americans struggle to eat a healthier diet, the FDA has taken draconian steps to suppress information about foods that reduce disease risk.

While various agencies of the federal government encourage us to eat more fruits and vegetables, the FDA has issued an edict that precludes cherry companies from posting scientific data on their websites. This censorship of published peer-reviewed studies denies consumers access to information that could be used to make wiser food choices…

On October 17, 2005, the FDA banned information about cherries’ health benefits from appearing on websites. The FDA sent warning letters to 29 companies that market cherry products. In these letters, the FDA ordered the companies to stop publicizing scientific data about cherries. According to the FDA, when cherry companies disseminate this information, the cherries become unapproved drugs subject to seizure. The FDA warns that if those involved in cherry trafficking continue to inform consumers about these scientific studies, criminal prosecutions will ensue…

Do Cherries Prevent Cancer?

In a warning letter to Friske Orchards of Ellsworth, MI, the FDA recites the following information contained on this orchard’s website:

“Tart cherries may reduce the risk of colon cancer because of the anthocyanins and cyanidin contained in the cherry.”

The FDA goes on to say in its warning letter:

“These claims cause your product to be a drug as defined in section 201(g) . . . Because this product is not generally recognized as safe and effective when used as labeled, it is also defined as a new drug in section 201(p) . . . Under section 505 of the Act (21 USC 355), a new drug may not be legally marketed in the United States without an approved New Drug Application . . .”

Interestingly, the FDA is not denying the veracity of this information. Instead, it insists that a new drug application has to be approved before the public can be informed about the scientific data supporting cherries. The FDA also asserts, without any basis, that cherries “have not been recognized as safe and effective when used as labeled.” According to the FDA’s interpretation of the law, cherry growers are engaged in criminal conduct by relaying findings that have been published in peer-reviewed scientific journals. Whether you or other Americans develop cancer does not appear to be a consideration …

BTW, having great results on energy with the Harmony Chips despite diagnosed Chronic Fatigue. I am wearing three (3) in a headset when I meditate and achieving deep meditation states quickly and easily. Wearing this configuration has helped effectiveness of my power naps. When I wear the headset to sleep, I wake up even after only four hours of sleep, feeling rested. While I would not recommend doing this every day, those of us who are forced into short nights because of work and travel schedules will find these chips beneficial.

While I am awake, I wear one (1) chip on the thymus and one (1) on the solar plexus. If standing on concrete floors, I have found that my feet last longer with two (2) chips in my shoes. My productivity and efficiency have been boosted some 500%.

Putting a chip under my water is producing delicious water. I can really tasted the differences now. Seem to be able to notice chemicals and wanting to drink and eat more healthy food.

Hair and nails are growing much faster. Manicures have to be redone every three days now, as opposed to every two weeks. I feel stronger, healthier, more vibrant.

I recommend that any road warrior such as myself travel at least with four (4) chips. Having five (5) makes it much easier to show to someone who wants to see a chip.

Chris Abiera
CIO
Now Training Inc.

Read the Physician’s Desk Reference (PDR) warnings on any drug you take. This will cause you to stop taking many of them. In this case, the PDR would not have helped.

Can Eli Lilly be Held Criminally Liable for Zyprexa?
By Evelyn Pringell, CounterPunch, 4 Jan 2007

California Attorney, Ted Chabasinski, is calling for the criminal prosecution of Eli Lilly executives for hiding the adverse effects of Zyprexa, based in part on articles last month in the New York Times which quote internal company documents that revealed that Lilly knew about the adverse effects for a decade but kept the information hidden.

Mr Chabasinski, appeared by teleconference in US District Court for the Eastern District of New York, on January 3, 2007, before Judge Jack Weinstein, on behalf of MindFreedom, a non-profit human rights organization, in response to a motion by Lilly basically filed to keep the incriminating information hidden, to defend the public’s right to know the contents of the secret Lilly documents concerning Zyprexa.

Mr Chabasinski told the judge that the documents are evidence of Lilly executives’ “criminal behavior” and “willingness to kill people for profit.”

The court granted MindFreedom’s request for more time to respond to Lilly’s motion, and another hearing is set for January 16, 2007. Meanwhile Judge Weinstein said that he was taking “no position” about those people who were not named but who already have copies of the Lilly files on Zyprexa.

Prior to the hearing, in a letter to the judge, Mr Chabasinski pointed out that while the underlying case in which the documents were under seal is civil, the documents reveal criminal behavior on the part of Lilly’s executives. “They have chosen a course of action,” he told the judge, “lying about and hiding the real effects of Zyprexa, that they knew would lead to the injury and death of literally thousands of people.”

“If this isn’t criminal,” he stated, “I don’t know what is.”

The company documents also show that Lilly engaged in a massive illegal off-label marking campaign to get primary care physicians to prescribe Zyprexa for uses never approved by the FDA to increase profits.

The studies in adults with Zyprexa that Lilly submitted to the FDA demonstrate, as far as I can establish, a higher death rate on Zyprexa than on any other anti-psychotic ever recorded. David Healy M.D.