Skip to content

Frequency Foundation

Twice the Energy with Half the Stress

Lyme Flu Frequencies Version 1.6

Frequency Foundation
Original Research on Lyme Flu
Version 1.6 – 9 January 2008
©Frequency Foundation 2005-200

All frequencies are based on original research on thousands of people, animals, microscopic slides, and high resolution digital photos and microscopic images of the actual organism. The Frequency Foundation database contains gigabytes of original raw frequency data from a decade of research. For questions, errors, or omissions contact: mailto:[email protected] Frequencies are for research purposes only and may be helpful, harmful, or ineffective depending on how they are used. These programs may generate negative side effects in the form of Herxheimer reactions or other phenomenon and are only to be used by other researchers for experimentation at their own risk.

Lyme Flu

An unusual flu-like illness has been observed on the East Coast, West Coast, and Chicago by Frequency Foundation researchers. Analysis indicates that it is caused by Lyme organisms including six virus strains and a parasite.

All Lyme clients are infected with these organisms. This set of pathogens has taken on a life of its own and is infecting large numbers of people causing runny noses, sinus drainage, and other flu-like symptoms.

Of particular interest are two of the viruses which are strains of the Borna virus. This virus causes mental problems, depression, rashes, tooth decay and many other symptoms. In addition to elimination of cold/flu symptoms, application of these frequencies has reduced depression in some people and increased mental clarity in others.

Viruses are usually found in conjunction with parasites infected with them. This is the most likely route of infection in most flus. Microscopic parasites are passed by airborne or contact exposure. The parasites are infected with viruses and other organisms. Killing the viruses stirs up the parasites as they are now feeling much healthier generating a Herxheimer effect which can be dealt with by herbal supplements noted.

All persons with Lyme disease appear to be infected with the Lyme Flu and these frequencies will be incorporating into future releases of the Lyme frequency series.

Note: By the end of 2008, multiple major upgrades to Lyme frequencies have been producted with thousands of new frequencies. Become a subscriber and you will get latest updates. See button on left side of page.

Flaxseed Reduces Hot Flashes


Flaxseed Shows Potential to Reduce Hot Flashes

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

ROCHESTER, Minn. — Data from a new Mayo Clinic study suggest that dietary therapy using flaxseed can decrease hot flashes in postmenopausal women who do not take estrogen. The findings from the pilot study are published in the summer 2007 issue of the Journal of the Society for Integrative Oncology.

——————
In 21 women who completed the study at the Mayo Clinic, hot flash frequency was cut in half and severity was reduced by 57%. Improved mood, reduced joint or muscle pain, fewer chills, and less sweating was reported.

Laughter is the Best Medicine

Remember Norman Cousins? He used laughter to get himself out of his death bed when drugs didn’t work.

Dr. Whitaker reports in his latest newsletter than adverse drug events rose 260% since 1998 and deaths induced by these events rose by 270%. Medical error was already the third leading cause of death in the U.S., largely due to adverse drug events. It may eventually exceed cancer deaths and become the second leading cause of death, assuming cancer deaths do not increase faster than drug induced deaths.

Well it is all about the money. When you are fat, dumb, and sick you take a lot of drugs and they keep you that way. The best we can probably do about it (other than just say no) is to laugh a lot and Bill Maher will definitely make you chuckle. There is nothing like a little gallows humor to make your day!

Check out Bill Meyer’s pro-life rant (otherwise known as his Anti-Pharma rant).

200khz EM Field Slows Brain Tumors: Too bad they don’t use the correct frequencies …


Electricity Can Slow the Progression of Certain Cancers

New research in the August Issue of Physics Today explains how low-intensity electric fields can disrupt the division of cancer cells and slow the growth of brain tumors. The team of researchers used alternating electric fields that shift electric particles in cells back and forth hundreds of thousands of times per second. These low-intensity alternating electric fields were once thought to only heat cells but after several years of experiments, the researchers have shown the fields to disrupt cell division in tumor cells placed on a glass dish.

After studying the effect of electricity in vitro and in labratory animals, the researchers began a small human clinical trial. The technique was applied to ten patients with glioblastoma multiforme, a type of brain cancer with a low survival rate. The researchers fitted the patients with electrodes that applied 200 kHz electric fields to the scalp at regular intervals for up to 18 hours a day. The cancer was observed to be progressing to advanced stages at a much slower rate (a median of 26 weeks) and in some cases even regressed. Typical time for tumor progression is 10 weeks and 3 of the 10 patients were still alive two years after the electrode therapy started.

Electric field therapy is found to have two effects on tumor cells. First, it slows down cell division by disrupting the formation and function of a key cell structure known as the mitotic spindle. Second, the electric field can sometimes cause the daughter cells to self destruct by forcing structures and molecules away from its infrastructure before the cell splits away from its partner . Electrode therapy poses little danger to normal brain tissue, because healthy brain cells do not divide. Researchers are now investigating the possibilities of combining electric fields with low-dose chemotherapy.

Prostate Cancer Treatment: It’s all about the money …

FDA Officials Sued Over Conflicts of Interests
September 30, 2007. By Evelyn Pringle

Washington, DC: A lawsuit recently filed in a federal court in Ohio against FDA officials on behalf of terminal cancer patients provides a rare window into the inner workings of an agency hijacked by pharmaceutical industry giants and stacked with insiders by President George Bush to guard against any threat to the profits of his top campaign contributors.

The lawsuit’s complaint describes a conspiracy orchestrated by top FDA officials to basically drive a small company, Dendreon, out of business with the obvious goal of eliminating competition in what has become a thriving new industry involving the treatment of men with prostate cancer.

The complaint gives the details of a step-by-step plot to sabotage the FDA approval process of Provenge, the first-of-a-kind vaccine that can prolong the lives of men with late-stage cancer.

——–
Note: This treatment involves a vaccine with virtually no side effects which replaces chemotherapy. This is a disruptive technology that could rapidly alter the landscape of cancer treatment. Current business interests will do everything they can to suppress competition from these treatments at the cost of patient lives.

RF Generator for treating cancer burns salt water as fuel

The opportunity for innovation to solve health and environmental problems is far greater than most people realize. The challenge is to turn new innovations into useful products which requires hard work, venture capital, and protection from business and other interests that are threatened by new technologies appearing on the market.

Salt water as fuel? Erie man hopes so
Sunday, September 09, 2007
By David Templeton, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

For obvious reasons, scientists long have thought that salt water couldn’t be burned.

So when an Erie man announced he’d ignited salt water with the radio-frequency generator he’d invented, some thought it a was a hoax.

John Kanzius, a Washington County native, tried to desalinate seawater with a generator he developed to treat cancer, and it caused a flash in the test tube.

Within days, he had the salt water in the test tube burning like a candle, as long as it was exposed to radio frequencies.

His discovery has spawned scientific interest in using the world’s most abundant substance as clean fuel, among other uses.

Rustum Roy, a Penn State University chemist, held a demonstration last week at the university’s Materials Research Laboratory in State College, to confirm what he’d witnessed weeks before in an Erie lab.

Lyme Disease and the Incompetence of Conventional Medicine

A recent ABC News show interviewed an individual with Lyme disease:

1. Doctors were telling her its all in her head. This is common. (Your brain is being destroyed by the Lyme complex and the physicians are clueless).
2. No good diagnostic tests.
3. No good conventional treatment.
4. She got better become her doctor used an unapproved medical treatment that could have caused him loss of his medical license.

Take a look at this ABC news interview.

Antibiotics only eliminates the bacteria in Lyme disease. It is usually ineffective with the viruses, fungi, parasites, mycoplasma, and other organisms, particularly those bioengineered to be untreatable at Plum Island.

Viruses, Fat, and Obesity


My research indicates that there are dozens of viruses stored in the fatty tissue of everyone, particularly in the gut. There are at least nine different variations of altered cells caused by each virus, along with a dozen or more other components that are side effects of virus construction and replication.

These altered cells are difficult to eliminate in the abdomen and certain viruses like the one below cause them to proliferate. Once the viruses are eliminated by frequencies, many burn off immediately, fat redistributes normally in the body, and diet and exercise appear to burn off fat normally.

Scientists Say Common Virus Could Cause Obesity
Medical News Today – Featured Article
21 Aug 2007 – 3:00 PDT

Scientists at the 234th national meeting of the American Chemical Society in Boston, Massachusetts this week presented the results of a study that suggests a common virus could be partly responsible for the obesity epidemic that is sweeping across America and other nations. They hope their findings will develop antiviral medication to treat “viral obesity”.

According to the National Institutes of Health (NIH), some 97 million adult Americans are obese. Obesity increases risk of many illnesses, including type 2 diabetes, heart disease, stroke, and osteoarthritis.

So far scientists have shown that genetic predisposition increases risk of obesity, as do other contributory factors including over-eating, eating foods high in fat, lack of physical exercise, genetics, and some medications.

In this latest study, researchers used lab experiments to show that infection with a common virus that causes respiratory and eye infections in humans, called human adenovirus-36 (Ad-36) turns adult stem cells retrieved from fat tissue into fat cells. But stem cells that were not exposed to Ad-36 did not turn into fat cells.

The scientists have also discovered that a specific gene in the virus causes the transformation from stem cells into fat cells.

Presenting the results of the study was Dr Magdalena Pasarica, obesity researcher at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center, part of Louisiana State University:

“We’re not saying that a virus is the only cause of obesity, but this study provides stronger evidence that some obesity cases may involve viral infections.”

Pasarica explained that:

“Not all infected people will develop obesity. We would ultimately like to identify the underlying factors that predispose some obese people to develop this virus and eventually find a way to treat it.”

Pasarica and colleagues took adult stem cells from the fatty tissue of a range of patients who had undergone liposuction. They exposed half of the stem cells to Ad-36, but not the other half.

After a week, most of the virus infected stem cells had transformed into fat cells, but the ones that were not infected had not changed.

Pasarica was involved in an earlier study led by Dr Nikhil Dhurandhar, now associate professor at Pennington Biomedical Research Center. The study showed that Ad-36 caused fat accumulation in animals infected with the virus. The research team then carried out an epidemiological study that showed 30 per cent of obese people were infected with Ad-36, compared with only 11 per cent of lean people.

It was not until this latest study that they were able to show how the virus actually increases fat in humans, according to the researchers.

The research team has also identified a gene in the Ad-36 virus, called E4Orfl, that seems to play a key role in switching on the fat accumulation process in infected animals. The gene could be a target for a range of human therapies, including vaccines and anti-virals, to treat obesity, said Pasarica.

Ginger causes ovarian cancer cells to die


Ginger causes ovarian cancer cells to die, U-M researchers find

ANN ARBOR, MI – Ginger is known to ease nausea and control inflammation. But researchers at the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center are investigating a new use for this age-old remedy: treating ovarian cancer.

J. Rebecca Liu, M.D.In laboratory studies, researchers found ginger caused ovarian cancer cells to die. Further, the way in which the cells died suggests ginger may avoid the problem common in ovarian cancer of cells becoming resistant to standard treatments.

The researchers are presenting their results in a poster session at the American Association for Cancer Research annual meeting.

Researchers used ginger powder, similar to what is sold at grocery stores, only a standardized research grade. The ginger powder was dissolved in solution and applied to ovarian cancer cell cultures. Ginger induced cell death in all the ovarian cancer cell lines tested.

Moreover, the researchers found that ginger caused two types of cell death. One type, known as apoptosis, results from cancer cells essentially committing suicide. The other type of cell death, called autophagy, results from cells digesting or attacking themselves.

Chemotherapy: High Cost for Marginal Benefit


The emperor’s new clothes – can chemotherapy survive?
Eva Segelov, Medical Oncologist, St Vincent’s Clinical School, Sydney
(Aust Prescr 2006;29:2-3)

‘An Australian study suggests that the benefits of chemotherapy have been oversold … Why has it been oversold? Are you suggesting that medical oncologists in Australia are just sort of marketing shysters or what?’ These were some of the questions posed by Dr Norman Swan when he presented the Health Report on ABC Radio National on 18 April 2005. Dr Swan was quizzing Associate Professor Graeme Morgan, the lead author of a controversial article entitled ‘The contribution of cytotoxic chemotherapy to 5-year survival in adult malignancies’. This article reported that chemotherapy has improved survival by less than 3% in adults with cancer.

These provocative figures were derived from a literature search of all randomised clinical trials reporting a five-year survival benefit attributable solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy in 22 major adult malignancies. The common malignancies of bowel, lung, breast and prostate were included. The total number of newly diagnosed cancer patients for each malignancy in 1998 was determined from cancer registry data in Australia and the USA. The absolute number to benefit was the product of the total number of patients with that malignancy, the proportion or sub-group(s) with that malignancy showing a benefit, and the percentage increase in five-year survival due solely to cytotoxic chemotherapy. The overall contribution was the sum total of the absolute numbers of patients showing a five-year survival benefit expressed as a percentage of the total number for the 22 malignancies.

Overall cancer survival, following all kinds of treatment, is approximately 63%. Based on the calculations in the study the contribution of chemotherapy to adult survival from cancer was estimated to be 2.3% in Australia and 2.1% in the USA. The authors, two of whom are radiation oncologists, but one of whom is a practicing professor of medical oncology, concluded that ‘chemotherapy only makes a minor contribution to cancer survival’ and ‘to justify the continued funding and availability of drugs used in cytotoxic chemotherapy, a rigorous evaluation of the cost-effectiveness and impact on quality of life is urgently required’.